NetWorker Blog

Commentary from a long term NetWorker consultant and Backup Theorist

  • This blog has moved!

    This blog has now moved to Please jump across to the new site for the latest articles (and all old archived articles).



  • Enterprise Systems Backup and Recovery

    If you find this blog interesting, and either have an interest in or work in data protection/backup and recovery environments, you should check out my book, Enterprise Systems Backup and Recovery: A Corporate Insurance Policy. Designed for system administrators and managers alike, it focuses on features, policies, procedures and the human element to ensuring that your company has a suitable and working backup system rather than just a bunch of copies made by unrelated software, hardware and processes.
  • Advertisements
  • This blog has moved!

    This blog has now moved to Please jump across to the new site for the latest articles (and all old archived articles).



  • Twitter

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

Please, No!

Posted by Preston on 2009-10-30

So now the folks at the interoperability labs at Microsoft want to open up the Outlook PST format so that other people can interoperate with it.

Hmmm, forgive me, but that sounds a bit too much like Harrison Bergeron. Equality for all doesn’t mean the experience sucks any less.

The PST format (and the more recent updates for Outlook/Entourage) have been the bane of the average system or backup administrators’ existence for way, way too long.

Oh I recognise the arguments in opening it up: it will allow developers to come up with custom access programs/software, and that may include utilities to allow easier block level backup of local PST files. (See here.)

You know what I think it’s more likely to do though? Encourage more people to use a format that shouldn’t have been created in the first place, to hold data that shouldn’t be there, and thus create more backup and storage problems.

If the Microsoft interoperability labs were serious about interoperability, they’d have published a timeline on moving either towards a more open mail format (not by creating published data structures, but by using honest to goodness simple formats plain text, attachments, etc.), or at least, if nothing else, a stripped down SQL database and provide a local utility/API that can be used to access in plain relational database format. They do, after all, design their own SQL database server, and they provide ODBC client access at the OS level (something I’m constantly reminded of by Excel users!) What’s more, Apple managed to integrate this style of system into their OS, so it can hardly be said that it’s not possible.


One Response to “Please, No!”

  1. Exactly what I want. All the specs on a technology that does nothing except cause problems. /sigh

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: